Pages

Friday, July 19, 2013

Zionism – a perspective of a religious "peacenik" -By Chief Rabbi David Rosen



                Zionism – a perspective of a religious "peacenik"
                                    Chief Rabbi David Rosen

While the political movement known as Zionism was produced by eighteenth century rationalism and nineteenth century nationalism; without the unique historical and spiritual bond of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel, those secular forces alone could never have brought about the remarkable success that this political movement eventually secured. Moreover even when the British offered the Zionist movement an alternative location in which the Jewish people could take its destiny into its own hands; this was overwhelmingly rejected by secular Zionists as well.

Zionism has always meant the return of the Jewish people to establish independent Jewish life in its ancestral homeland. However precisely the combination of the aforementioned secular forces together with the historical bonds of a religious heritage, meant that there were and are many "zionisms", or in other words different ways of understanding the character and purpose of this enterprise.

Those that call themselves "religious Zionists" see the success of the Zionist enterprise as both a manifestation of Divine fidelity to the promise of return (see Leviticus 26 v.44 & 45) and as facilitating the ability to live a full religious national life in accordance with Jewish teaching (e.g. Leviticus 20 v.22-26; see Babylonian     Talmud, tractate Ketubot, folio 111)  However religious Zionists are also divided in their interpretation of the meaning of the establishment of the State of Israel. There are those who see it in messianic terms as fulfillment of Divine prophecy and as the first stage in the advent of messianic restoration and universal peace; while other religious Zionists have adopted a more pragmatic approach and see the state simply in its facilitatory role as abovementioned. 

However not only religious Zionists, but also secular Zionists (both of the nationalist and socialist variety) saw the establishment of the State of Israel in moral terms, guaranteeing franchise, dignity, equality before the law, education and social services to all its citizens. This spirit and vision are evidenced in Israel's Declaration of Independence which also promises freedom of worship to all the religious communities of the Land. Moreover already in its early decades Israel saw itself as having responsibility to share and offer its technological achievements to the developing world.

From a Jewish religious perspective, this ethical dimension is critical to the meaning and success of Zionism. Not only does the Torah declares that the Jewish people is ideally to dwell in the Land in order to live as a nation in accordance with the revealed Divine tenets and commandments; but that failure to do undermines the ability of the People to live in the Land and leads to exile (Leviticus loc.cit. ) Moreover this condition is overwhelmingly portrayed both in the Torah and in the Prophets in terms of the values of justice and righteousness and the social ethical precepts especially towards the vulnerable and the "other".

The Zionist movement sought from the beginning to achieve a modus vivendi both with the local Arab communities and with the Arab world. In 1919 the preeminent Arab leader, the Emir Faisal, son of the Sherif of Mecca, co-signed a document with the president of the World Zionist Organization Dr. Chaim Weizman (later to become the first president of the State of Israel) welcoming the Zionist enterprise and expressing the hope that Jews and Arabs would work together to bring about a flourishing of the region for the benefit of all. The unfolding political developments meant that that dream was lost and conflict ensued with both Arab nationalism and nascent Palestinian nationalism. This conflict has caused much bloodshed, suffering, displacement and enmity. This should be a source of much distress to us who are proud to be called Jews and Zionists, for the vision of Torah and the vision of Zionism is one in which not only Jews but all people live in peace and dignity.

Moreover the conflict has inevitably been very costly for Israeli society and not only materially. Generally, I believe that Israel can be proud of the fact that despite the conflict, it has guaranteed equality of franchise and to a very large degree equality before the law for all its citizens. However it would be disingenuous to deny that the conflict does impinge on the freedoms and opportunities of Israel's Arab citizens.

Moreover while Israel assumed control of Gaza and areas of Judea and Samaria that constitute the West Bank as a result of a successful war of self defense in 1967, the price of controlling the lives of millions of Palestinians under occupation has inevitably had a deleterious affect on the moral fibre and institutions of Israeli life. That is why in my opinion a peaceful resolution of the conflict and the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside the State of Israel is essential not only for Israel's security, for the right of Palestinian national self determination; but also for the health of Judaism, Zionism and Israel's moral character.

For the same reasons I co-founded the organization Rabbis for Human Rights, not only because I believe that  Jews who are true to their religio-ethical heritage are obliged to concern themselves with the human rights of others, especially those who confront the consequences of a conflict of which we are a part; but also because the concept of human rights is ultimately indivisible. If we disregard them in one place, that disregard will come back to haunt us in another. This danger is patently obvious today to all who are not willfully blind.

There is arguably no parallel in human history to the success of Zionism in restoring the Jewish people to independent life in its ancestral homeland; just as there is no parallel to the degree of fidelity that an exiled people maintained in relation to its land for two millennia. However in order to ensure the future success of Zionism we have to find a way out of the present political stalemate, so that the land which three Faiths call holy, may be a place of flourishing for us all.



Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Renee Leavy Kohn comments on "The contemporary state of Israel is thus Jewish in name and European in practice."- David Shasha

 25 June 2013

Renee Leavy Kohn

From David Shasha this morning: "The contemporary state of Israel is thus Jewish in name and European in practice."

As I have repeatedly said in my discussions of Zionism and Talmudic Judaism, those Religious Zionists who believe in the redemptive value of the current state of Israel are in a quandary: the Jewish liturgical framework was designed to address the harsh reality of Exile and Diaspora.... The formal Jewish prayers contain numerous references to the Destruction of the Temple and loss of national sovereignty. Normative Zionism, as is clear, had no concern for the religious aspects of Judaism and paid no attention to the internal transformation that would or would not take place in religious life after its establishment.

But for Orthodox Jews who believe that the state of Israel has a definite religious function, contemporary Zionism presents the sort of challenge that we see addressed in this often excruciating article by a prominent Religious Zionist leader.

The Jewish fasts – outside Yom Kippur and the Fast of Esther – are linked to the Destruction of the Temple. The 9th of Ab marks the destruction of both the first and second Temples.

Religious Zionists are thus left in a precarious situation: How does one argue for the religious significance of Israel today and still mourn the Exile of the Jews from their land?.............




  • Renee Leavy Kohn This internal contradiction in legal logic is a reflection of the internal contradiction of Zionism as a religious reality: For the first time in Jewish history the Jewish people are being led and controlled by a group of Jews who have no formal connection to the Jewish Law.

    When we look back to the restoration after the destruction of the First Temple, it was led by Ezra the Scribe who was a proto-Rabbinic figure set on re-establishing the Jewish Law for the returnees. At the time of the destruction of the Second Temple there was already a firm institution of rabbinical leadership which was in the process of formulating the Jewish legal tradition in texts such as the Mishnah and Tosefta.

    The rabbis’ attitude toward the Bar Kokhba revolt was ambivalent at best. Like the much later messianic movement of Sabbatai Sevi in the 17th century, the rabbis were at pains to figure out what the movement really meant in national-religious terms. In the end, after both movements failed, they did their best to erase the traces of the messianism and put into place safeguards to ensure the integrity of Jewish Law in the wake of the disastrous effects of the apocalyptic frenzy of the widespread, popular messianism.

    The current state of Israel has clearly sustained in a way that the earlier messianic movements did not. But the state of Israel was formed as a Western European nation-state with no formal ties to Jewish law. In spite of the fact that Zionist leaders in the early days of the state vested power related to Jewish status issues in the hands of an officially recognized rabbinate, the religious element was suppressed and marked as alien to the formal process of government.

    The contemporary state of Israel is thus Jewish in name and European in practice.

    Religious Zionists must deflect the ultimate religious implications of this political reality. The agonizing choice of whether or not to continue to fast on these days is a particular problem, as is the fixed formulation of the Jewish Liturgy.

    What has essentially happened in Religious Zionist thought, as this article clearly indicates, is to mark the founding of Israel in 1948 as the initial step in a larger process whose contours are not yet fully known or understood. Rather than being a political process that is self-contained, Zionism is an open-ended process that has left key questions open and incomplete.

    In this sense, contemporary Religious Zionists are in a similar position to the early Christians who believed that the Redemption had come, but who were forced to face the harsh reality that there was indeed no “Peace on Earth” as prophesied in the Bible. It was then asserted that the Death and Resurrection of Jesus was not a definitive political fact, but only the first stage of the Redemption which would be completed at some uncertain future date when Jesus would return to Earth in a final Apocalyptic revelation.

    To this point there is only confusion in Religious Zionism which has – as this tortuous article shows – not really worked out the details of the national Redemption. Religious Zionists are well aware that the government of Israel has no intention of adopting Jewish Law as its constitution and its adherence to Western norms has even reversed many basic Jewish principles. The country continues to move further and further from the Halakha as time passes and tension mounts in the Religious Zionist community which has become more and more extreme and partisan relative to the Israeli government.

    The Ultra-Orthodox have little problem with this as they have traditionally seen the Israeli government as interlopers in the religious sense and do not accept its authority in Jewish terms. Although the situation of the Ultra-Orthodox is changing in interesting and often dangerous ways, the thinking of Religious Zionist leaders has hit a wall: Many younger members of their community have indeed sought to displace the government of Israel in order to create a Messianic state based on Jewish Law.
  • Renee Leavy Kohn Zionism always contained the seeds of this anarchic energy. By opening the Pandora’s Box of Jewish messianism, Zionism rolled the dice in the belief that Judaism would die out as a religious structure. As has frequently been the case with Religious Zionist leaders, Rabbi Melamed counsels moderation and a suspension of religious ideals in the service of the state. He rules that Jews should continue fasting on the proscribed days. But what he does not address is the contradiction between Religious Zionism’s belief that the current state of Israel is indeed a religious reality and the fact that the state has basically rejected the foundations of Jewish Law.

    The Talmudic tradition grew out of the tragedy of Exile and Diaspora. The Sages over many generations formulated rulings for a community living under Gentile sovereignty. The Rabbinical system has never been run in the context of a Jewish state with complete national autonomy and sovereignty. The Talmud has even counseled Jews against “Forcing the End” and trying to bring the Messiah without God’s express command.

    It would be logical to assume that under a Jewish government that is invested in the Torah tradition a Jewish state would be forced to adapt and modify many Jewish practices – such as fasting – in order to reflect the new reality.

    But in point of fact there has never been a formal acceptance of a new reality other than the commemoration of the founding of the state on its Independence Day. The larger and much thornier questions that are raised by Halakha and national sovereignty have been scrupulously avoided. And as Rabbi Melamed shows in this article, there is no real idea of how to even begin to address them.

    But as Religious Zionist leaders continue to be unable to decide how the current state of Israel fits into the larger Talmudic scheme of restoration and redemption, a new generation of Israeli Religious Zionists has no such problem: The fanaticism of the so-called Hilltop Youth and their supporters in both the Settler community and the larger “Nationalist” community have determined that they will take the law into their own hands.

    In this context it is worthwhile to note that the traditional belief in God’s sovereingnty as expressed by Prophets has been formally dispensed with. After many centuries of quiescence, we now have Jews who believe that it is possible to commandeer the process of Redemption on their own. God is not at all a part of the picture.

    It is this situation that has led to the massive internal contradictions in Religious Zionism and exposed its faulty Halakhic logic.

    DS
  • Yitzchak Micha'el The ISRAELI STATE was the EUROPEAN WESTERN response to increased influence and numbers of Religious Jewish communities living in Palestine. So the establishment of BEN GURION's STATE was nothing more than a comprmise at best from the EUROPEAN's point of view. In this the Arabs are right the STATE is EUROPEAN but yet the people are not this was all the more the case with the increase the manipulation and removal of jewish communities from the Islamic countries. The secularisation or more aptly the Romanisation / Euro-fication of their children through forced secular education upon their arrival in interment camps only increased this EU values that we see in those that call themselves Secular today as they say Everybody's Grandparents are Religious only is further testimony to this process.
  • Yitzchak Micha'el The rise of Baalei Teshuvah Movement was not expected by the secular designers as they cannot fathom the Jewish Neshamah's yearning for the Creator and their proper role and way of living before him.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

A Discussion in Facebook social media on the news clip "Abbas threatens to dismantle PA if peace talks don’t start" dt June 05, 2013





1.        Avraham Goldstein shared a link.  
Hey, Abbas, stop threatening and start doing! We CHALLENGE YOU to keep-up to your words and to (finally) dismantle this useless PA as soon as possible! Do it already, ……!
Top of Form
1Like · · Share
o    Avraham Goldstein and 2 others like this.
o   
Kazi Azizul Huq Recommended "Hey, Abbas, stop threatening and start doing! We CHALLENGE YOU to keep-up to your words"
o   
Avraham Goldstein He is repeating these "threats" for several years now! Actually, I would LOVE this useless PA to be dismantled (and the Oslo Accords nullified and/or cancelled), so we all can look for some REAL solutions to our problems in the Middle East!!!

People in the Middle East will have to talk to other people there and find our (mutual) ways to solve our problems together! External "solutions" coming/initiated from Britain, France, Norway, E.U., U.S.A., U.S.S.R, etc. only made/make things worse (for the last 95 years)!!!
o   
en.wikipedia.org
The Faisal–Weizmann Agreement was signed on 3 January 1919, by Emir Faisal (son ...of the King of Hejaz), who was for a short time King of the Arab Kingdom of Syria or Greater Syria in 1920, and was King of the Kingdom of Iraq (today, Iraq) from August 1921 to 1933, and Chaim Weizmann (later President…See More
o   
Avraham Goldstein "Faisal conditioned his acceptance on the fulfillment of British wartime promises to the Arabs, who had hoped for independence in a vast part of the Ottoman Empire. He appended to the typed document a hand-written statement:

"Provided the Arabs obtain their independence as demanded in my [forthcoming] Memorandum dated the 4th of January, 1919, to the Foreign Office of the Government of Great Britain, I shall concur in the above articles. But if the slightest modification or departure were to be made [regarding our demands], I shall not be then bound by a single word of the present Agreement which shall be deemed void and of no account or validity, and I shall not be answerable in any way whatsoever."

The Arabs did not obtain their independence and the Faisal-Weizmann agreement survived only a few months. The decision of the peace conference itself refused independence for the vast Arab-inhabited lands that Faisal desired, mainly because the British and French had struck their own secret Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 dividing the Middle East between their own spheres of influence. ... "
o   
Avraham Goldstein Basically, Britain and France played as all back then! We could have peace and live normally already for 95 years now!!!!
o   
Maher Ali today is amsterdam day. keep update with pics i upload loool
o   
Roman Zaletilo Этот абаска все обещает да обещает ........ напугал ежа голой задницей он ...... :)
o   
Kazi Azizul Huq I agree with Brother Avraham Goldstein that "People in the Middle East will have to talk to other people there and find our (mutual) ways to solve our problems together! External "solutions" coming/initiated from Britain, France, Norway, E.U., U.S.A., U.S.S.R, etc. only made/make things worse (for the last 95 years)!!!"
o   
Sandy Ang Is it another ploy of your to get statehood, Mr. Abbas?
Make my day Mr Abbas, Just do it!
o   
Kazi Azizul Huq @Avraham Goldstein - Thanks for the wiki article which I am reading. It is useful. I know much of it from my study of modern middle eastern history and the history of the Saud family. British monarchy and her employees are very complex and selfish cheaters - they always have hidden agenda. We Indians, our forefathers and we ourselves are suffering from the continuous British conspiracy to divide and dominate us. In Bangladesh Britain spends money in 2 programs, (1) Gender Program, and (2) Good Governance. Apparently, Gender Program is to protect women and children from violence and discrimination, and God Governance is to ensure transparent pro-people development oriented efficient governance. But in reality, Gender Program's hidden agenda is to destroy our indigenous religion based social fabric and legalize LGBT; and the hidden agenda of Good Governance is to empower their mercenaries (media, civil society, think tank etc.) and weaken our national government so that our government is unable to resist implementation of British agenda.